Week four: shit storms, comic writing, and the best, worst joke you can think of.
How are we on the fourth week already? These sessions seem to be flying by.
Like last week, we started with a check in, but this time, the theme was weather:
“If your week was a type of weather, which would it be and why?” Dave asked.
Between us, we could have made the front page of the Daily Express, covering all four seasons in the space of 10 minutes, as well as rainbows, hurricanes, blizzards, tsunamis, and shit storms (this, I feel I must regretfully clarify, was my contribution).
With the somewhat tempestuous check in out of the way, we got down to the nitty gritty by talking through the aims and objectives.
Before going into more detail, I’m going to add a small disclaimer. This week’s post might be a bit jumbled because, at the start of the session, I was in a really fucking bad mood. So much so, that I almost didn’t come.
To add insult to injury, Dave began by warning us that this week’s session would be quite heavy on the theory, and also potentially a bit confusing, admitting that he himself found this topic the most difficult to explain.
Usually, this sort of thing wouldn’t phase me, but on this occasion, I found myself groaning inwardly. After the week I’d had, confusing theory felt like the last thing I needed. As is often the case with me, self sabotaging and sacking whole thing off altogether seemed preferable to joining in and forcing myself to smile when I’d spent most of the afternoon drowning in a pool of tears that would have given Alice in Wonderland a run for her money.
But I fought the urge to wallow in my own self pity, putting all my energy instead into keeping an open mind, and I’m so glad I did.
As this week’s session was on joke writing, the aims and objectives were:
* To understand different types of jokes
* To get to grips with the mechanics of jokes and joke writing
And for Dave:
* To teach us how to do it
Not much to cover in an hour then…
By way of a warm up, we started with a game. One of us (me) was asked to choose an animal, and someone else a job title, and then we all had 60 seconds to come up with as many crossovers between the two as we could think of.
The chosen job – Police Officer – seemed simple enough, but not when compared with the animal I’d picked: a unicorn. That’ll teach me for trying to be quirky.
It was really bloody difficult, but between us, we managed to come up with a few:
Both are equally as good at preventing crime; have silly, phallic things on their heads; are never around when you need them to be; and have a jumped up sense of self importance. After all, as someone pointed out, a unicorn is really just a bog standard horse trying to be fancy.
Next, we moved on to last week’s homework task: to bring along the most rubbish joke we could think of.
Some of the best (worst) ones were:
Q. How do you make Christmas pasta?
A. In an advent colander.
I heard on the news today that people have been going around stealing motorway signs.
The police are looking for Leeds.
Q. What’s brown and sticky?
A. A stick.
And my personal favourites:
Q. What’s blue and sticky?
A. A blue stick.
Q. What’s blue and not heavy?
A. Light blue.
After we’d all had a much needed laugh, Dave started taking us through the mechanics and methods of joke writing.
Most often, you start by choosing a topic, when you have something you want to say but aren’t quite sure how to say it, or make it funny.
Next, you break it down. Using a spider diagram, explore every possible angle of the topic you can think of, listing all associations and connections that come into your head, no matter how small, tenuous, or seemingly random.
Once you’ve done this bit, pick one of your associations, and then find as many overlaps between that and your chosen topic.
The aim, Dave explained, is to get as far away from your topic as you can, while still making connections.
As an example, we looked at the topic of mental health, then tried to come up with as many associations as possible. Things like stability, mental illness, medication, therapy, wellbeing, research, eating disorders, depression, coping mechanisms, etc., etc.
Then, we looked at the sorts of connections we could make, in order to bridge the gaps between them, and come up with a punchline, which, he said, should always be hidden.
“People like to be fooled,” he said, “but they don’t like to be made fools of. That’s where subtext comes in.”
This is where things started to get a bit confusing. It all (sort of) made sense in theory, but I had absolutely no idea how I’d ever get from this stage to being able to write a single joke, let alone an entire set.
Luckily, Dave gave us some examples which helped shed a bit of light on the bits my worn-out brain was struggling to comprehend, including a clip of the brilliant comedian Hannah Gadsby, explaining how autism works.
So, as I understood it, the foundation should look something like this:
Topic – Association
Set-up – Connection
Hidden punchline
Admittedly, I was still a bit confused, but also excited by the prospect of getting a few more joke writing tips.
For the next part of the session, we started to explore two different methods: reinterpretation and stream of consciousness.
Reinterpretation seemed pretty self explanatory. In a nutshell, it involves looking at one specific word in detail, and finding ways to change it up, either with synonyms, opposites, different languages, puns, or a good old fashioned bit of word play. The Instagram account You Are Awesome -Positivity Puns has some great examples.
Stream of consciousness is centred around the notion that ideas can come from anywhere, at any time, and it’s a technique Eddie Izzard often uses, which he describes as ‘rolling over’ – sifting through the thoughts that come into your head, a bit like panning for gold.
For this approach, there are 3 basic steps:
*Write – do this with an open mind, being as non-judgemental as you can. Judgement kills creativity.
*Edit – sift through the crap and keep an eye out for those glimners of gold.
*Practice – joke writing can happen in any form, not just while you’re sitting at a laptop. Say things out loud, always trying to stay true to your authentic voice.
This was all quite a lot to take in, but eventually I think I’d begun to get the hang of it.
Towards the end of the session, several people – Dave included – told me how much it had meant that I’d been so open and honest about how I was feeling, and that I’d still chosen to come, even though initially, I didn’t want to.
I really appreciated this, but after reflecting on it a bit more, I realised something.
In showing up that night, I wasn’t just showing up for other people, or out of a sense of obligation – I was doing it for myself. Which, I suppose, is what recovering from an eating disorder (or any mental illness) is all about. Not only does it take a lot of hard work and determination, it involves showing up time and time again, when every fibre of your being is screaming at you to do the opposite.
Recovery is about showing up, not for your family, your friends or even your future self, but for the version of you existing in the here and now; the one who feels downtrodden and hopeless, and is in need of a bit of love and care. It’s about showing up for yourself in whichever way you can – no matter how small or inconsequential it may seem to anyone from the outside looking in, and allowing yourself to believe that you’re worth it.